I have MS resulting in brain damage, and I was ambushed with exhits at Trial, that could not be adduced. Therefore, other than me being deprived of Sec. 6 and 28 of the Canada Eveidence Act C-5. The Fresh Exibits were not within Trail Parameters. As it was agreed at Pre-trial. Well the agreement was not an agreement just vague instructions of what Justice Rawlins told the parties to Bring, Pursuant to Civil Practise Note 5 - Family Law Pre-trial Conferences. Old e-mail do not track or trace how my houses that were bought and sold and where it all went.

Trial Parameters:

Justice Rawlins at Pre-trial gave a description of what documents to bring. See the transcript page 31 line 21 of the transcript – (Exhibit #6a), "All we care about is the numbers" Page 34, line 46 and 47 of the transcript – (Exhibit #6b) Justice Rawlins stated. "All your disclosure should be there." Page 35, line 1 to 4 of the transcript – (Exhibit #6c), Justice Rawlins instructed to the parties, "I guess whatever documentation you have, to trace funds is what you’re going to need to show the trial judge. Okay Trace the funds from however many houses you all bought and where it all went. Okay?" Justice Rawlins gave Exhibit instructions, and moments later both parties acknowledged and Pre-trial ended. (Exhibit #6d) Page 37, line 20 to 30, Mr. Achtem states, “The bottom line is it’s the numbers, it’s based on the numbers” Then Justice Rawlins replies, “Yes.” Then Justice Rawlins looks at Ms. Achtem and questions, “Okay are we done then? We’re finished?” Then Ms. Achtem replies, “Yes, Your Honour.”